Weekly Reviews (3pts each): Each week, you should review the recent literature (published within the last 6 months) and select (1) article to review. Your review should be 200 – 300 words in length, a 2

[ad_1]

Weekly Reviews (3pts each): Each week, you should retrospect the new-fangled attainment (published amid the decisive 6 months) and choice (1) word to retrospect. Your retrospect should be 200 – 300 control in diffusiveness, and written in your own control. In your retrospect you should understand:

a. (1.5pts) A paltry summary/overview of the subject – What is the scrutiny con-over veritably encircling?

b. (1.5pts) Your reaction to the scrutiny – Reflect on what it instrument for coming scrutiny. What impacts government applications from this con-over feel?

· -1 purpose for retrospects that are beyond of the diffusiveness requirement

· No trustworthiness for retrospects that are not written in your own control.

Acceptable sources understand, but are not scant to:

Scientific American: http://www.scientificamerican.com/

American Scientist: http://www.americanscientist.org/

Science News: https://www.sciencenews.org/

BBC Focus: http://sciencefocus.com/category/article-categories/science

Science Magazine: http://www.sciencemag.org/

Nature: http://www.nature.com/

New York Times – Science: http://www.nytimes.com/pages/science/

Show more

[ad_2]
Source associate