Data Collection: Choosing Sources (People, Places, and Things)
Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Necessary scrutiny: Bridging the conceptual, speculative, and methodological. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Chapter 4, “Design and Reflexivity in Axioms Collection” (pp. 111–144)
Table 4.3, “Purposeful Sampling Strategies” (pp. 129–137)
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Necessary interviewing: The art of hearing axioms (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Chapter 3, “Qualitative Data-Gathering Methods and Style” (previously learn in Week 3)
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Chapter 5, Module 30: Purposeful sampling and circumstance selection: Overview of strategies and options. In Necessary scrutiny and evaluation methods (4th ed., pp. 264–315). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How numerous interviews are ample? An exemplification delay axioms saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
Retrieved from the Walden Library axiomsbases.
Mason, M. (2010). Pattern extent and saturation in PhD studies using necessary interviews. Forum Necessary Gregarious Scrutiny Sozialforschung, 11(3).
Yob, I., & Brewer, P. (n.d.). Working inside the despicable good-tempered: An online university's perspectives on gregarious shift, 1-25.
Document: Video Field Notes Direct (Word muniment)
Use this direct to succor you as you procure notes for your Scholar of Shift video.
Scholar of Shift Video #4
Topper, C. (2014). Christin Topper, PhD scholar, bringing the regular universe to Hong Kong [Video polish].
Note: The border diffusiveness of this resources participation is 2 minutes.
What is a good-tempered-tempered pattern in necessary scrutiny? It is NOT encircling extent or generalizability.
To make-ready for this Discussion:
Review the Guest, Bunce, and Johnson article; the Yob and Brewer article; and the Learning Resources akin to sampling and saturation for this week.
Prepare a critique of the sampling policy used by Yob and Brewer (n.d.). Include the subjoined your critique:
The intention of the con-over