Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
The suppliers of legislative blessings are legislators, and their important end is to be re-elected. Thus, legislators scarcity to maximize their chances for re-election, which requires gregarious patronage. Legislators are productive to be reasonable and to fashion cost-blessing calculations when faced after a while demands for parliament. However, the legislator’s cost-blessing calculations are not the cost-benefits to collection of enacting point parliament. Instead, the blessings are the joined gregarious patronage the legislator would admit from patronageing parliament and the past gregarious patronage they would run as a conclusion of their possession. When the blessing to legislators (independent gregarious patronage) exceeds their costs (disclaiming gregarious patronage) they obtain patronage parliament. (page 27)
Source: Feldstein, P. (2006). The politics of vigor parliament: An economic perspective (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Vigor Administration Press.
Review the Resources and animadvert on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Consider who blessings the most when prudence is familiar and in the composition of prudence implementation.
Post an exposition for how you contemplate the cost-blessing resolution in the assertion from page 27 of Feldstein (2006) monstrous efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, clear-up how analyses such as the one portrayed by the Feldstein assertion may pretend decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning exoteric policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). APA extract, 3 references